Need help with Online Courses or Podcasts? Click here or call 877-880-1335.
Please
Note!
Pennsylvania lawyers can
earn up
to 4 of the required 12 annual CLE credits by distance learning,
(online CLE, podcasts, or call-in CLE). Distance learning credits can
NOT be carried forward into your next compliance period.
More Info.
Test Your Computer
Test your system for the
functionality required to view our online seminars. Perform Test To
test podcasts, try one of our free podcasts
In our hypothetical case, an accused patent infringer has asserted that the inventor`s patent is unenforceable because the inventor and his attorney engaged in inequitable conduct when they procured the patent. More specifically, the inventor was inspired by a fictional movie but did not disclose that fact to the Patent and Trademark Office. Watch as counsel debate whether there was a duty to disclose this prior art that arguably was material to patentability. A fascinating case study for the intellectual property litigator.
This course was recorded in March 2011 at PBI`s 5th Annual Intellectual Property Law Institute. Other sessions from the IP Institute are available on PBI`s Online Campus.
Faculty
Hon. L. Felipe Restrepo, Magistrate Judge, US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Steven J. Rocci, Esq., Woodcock Washburn LLP, Philadelphia
Frederick A. Tecce, Esq., McShea & Tecce, P.C., Philadelphia
