27th ANNUAL ARIZONA YEAR IN EVIDENCE 2009 - NOW ONLINE! Featuring Superior Court Judge Crane McClennen and veteran attorneys William Doyle and William Sandweg III 27th Annual -- Still a must for all litigators!
3.25 Total CLE Units, 1.5 of which may be applied toward Ethics
Price:
$99.00 (provides online access for 3 months after purchase).
JUDGE CRANE MCCLENNEN, author of the Arizona Evidence Reporter, presents the most important 2008 evidentiary case law and trends. Expert trial lawyer Bill Doyle (defense perspective) and Bill Sandweg (plaintiff`s lawyer) show you how to get advantageous evidence admitted, and how to keep injurious evidence out. Learn how to make the case law work for you!
With purchase, receive a FREE copy of Judge McClennen`s Arizona Evidence Reporter, 2009 Supplement ($75 value)!*
*Mailed upon purchase and may take up to one week to arrive.
The Seminar
Highlights Include
Judge McClennen discusses the important evidence cases from 2008, including cases in these specific areas:
Admissibility of Remainder of or Related Writings or Recorded Statements: When one part is admitted, what does it take to get the other part admitted? Cruz, 181 P.3d 196 (2008).
Judicial Notice: what is it about marijuana that a court may take judicial notice? Hardesty, 204 P.3d 407 (Ct. App. 2008).
Presumptions: Mailing: When a plaintiff`s attorney mails a notice of claim to a governmental agency, is receipt presumed? Lee, 182 P.3d 1169 (2008).
Presumptions: Real Property: What is the presumption for adverse possession? Spaulding v. Pouliot, 181 P.3d 243 (Ct. App. 2008).
Relevance: To what extent is a property owner`s lowball evaluation for tax purposes relevant to the owner`s highball request for condemnation damages? SRP v. Miller Park LLC, 183 P.3d 497 (2008).
Evidence of Prior Sexual Activities: Is Other Act Evidence in a Sexually Violent Person case controlled by Rule 404(c)? Jaramillo, 176 P.3d 28 (Ct. App. 2008).
Subsequent Remedial Measures: When is evidence of subsequent remedial measures admissible in a case alleging negligence? Arizona v. Kingman, 176 P.3d 53 (Ct. App. 2008).
Anti-Marital Fact Privilege: What is meant by "for or against" the person asserting the privilege? MH 2007-000937, 189 P.3d 1090 (Ct. App. 2008).
Waiver of Privilege: When does a party`s conduct waive a privilege? Flores v. Cooper Tire, 178 P.3d 1176 (Ct. App. 2008).
Competency: Is an intoxicated person competent to testify was a witness? Cruz, 181 P.3d 196 (2008).
Refreshing Memory: When may you introduce extrinsic evidence of the prior statement? Ortega, 541 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3 (Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2008).
Confrontation: What is new with Crawford v. Washington?
Hearsay: When is a statement not a "statement"? Fischer, 199 P.3d 663 (Ct. App. 2008); Penn-American Ins. v. Sanchez, 202 P.3d 472 (Ct. App. 2008); Boggs, 185 P.3d 111 (2008)
Authentication and Identification: What does the judge decide and what do the jurors decide? Haight Gyuro, 186 P.3d 33 (Ct. App. 2008)
At the discussion portion of the presentation...a panel consisting of a plaintiff`s attorney and a defendant`s attorney discuss current areas of evidentiary interest.
Credit Information
3.25 Total CLE Units, 1.5 of which may be applied toward Ethics
Faculty
The Honorable Crane McClennen, Maricopa County Superior Court
