Complete Catalog OnDemand (Online CLE) CLE Calendar Webcasts CLE2GO Downloadable Publications Self Study Publications HelpLog In | Sign UpPrinter Friendly
Your shopping cart is empty 
Construction Law
search:
advanced
CLE2GO
CLE2GO
2012 Key Issues in Construction Law
Co-sponsored by the Construction Law Section
6.0 Total CLE Units, 1.0 of which may be applied toward Ethics
Price: $234.00 (provides online access for 12 months after purchase).
Course №:D1232-400
Duration: 5 Hours 52 Minutes
Original Program Date: Friday, March 2, 2012
Buy Now
Tell a Friend
  Item Description | Credit Information | Faculty | Course Materials
Item Description Back to top
 
Key Issues in Construction Litigation
Proving Owner’s Damages; Calculating Pre-Judgment Interest; Plus Other Lessons Learned from the Fairway Builders Decision.
 
Program Chair: Michael J. Holden, Holden Willits PLC
Sponsored by the State Bar of Arizona Construction Law Section
 

 
This year’s State Bar Construction Law Section All-Day Seminar will analyze the myriad of issues presented in the 1979 Arizona Court of Appeals decision in Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co., Inc.

Fairway Builders is an important case for construction lawyers primarily for its discussion on how to measure the owner’s damages for defective work.

The seminar’s faculty of experienced construction lawyers will use the Fairway Builders decision as the starting point to talk about these and related issues. Because of the wide range of subjects being presented, this seminar should be beneficial for anyone who practices construction law in Arizona.

The specific topics that will be discussed include:

• Cost of repair as the basis for awarding damages
• Dual use of "cost of repair" and "diminution of value" damage measures
• Stigma damages
• Use of statistical extrapolation to prove damages in defect cases
• The effect of "economic waste" on recovering damages
• Recovery and limitation of consequential damages
• Calculating pre-judgment interest
• Is Prompt Pay interest recoverable on mechanics’ lien and bond claims?
• Determining the amounts due on mechanics’ lien claims
• Mechanics’ liens for professional services
• Interpreting ambiguous provisions in contracts
Credit Information Back to top
6.0 Total CLE Units, 1.0 of which may be applied toward  Ethics

Faculty Back to top
Michael J. Holden, Holden Brodman PLC
David J. Cantelme, Jennings Strouss & Salmon PLC
Melvin Cohen, Mesch, Clark & Rothschild, Tucson
Robert O. Dyer, Polsinelli Shugart PC
Richard A. Friedlander, Mariscal Weeks McIntyre & Friedlander PA
Stephen Jackson, Warner Angle Jackson Hallam & Formanek
Sharon B. Shively, Sacks Tierney PA
James J. Sienicki, Snell & Wilmer LLP
David C. Tierney, Sacks Tierney PA
Barry A. Willits, Holden Willits PLC, Phoenix

Course Materials Back to top

icon_acrobatPower Point Slides (In Note Taking Format) (51 Pages, 2 MB)
icon_acrobatKey Issues in Construction Litigation (240 Pages, 14 MB)

Users who bought this CLE2GO also bought... Back to top
Publication
Construction Lien Law in Arizona: A Practice Manual (2005)
With Forms on CD
 
Electronic Document
Social Media Issues (6/2011) 
Electronic Document
Public Records and Open Meetings (1/09) 
CLE2GO
Writing to Win (2011) 
OnDemand (Online Seminar)
We the People... A Symposium on the U.S. Constitution and the Supreme Court
Technical Support:877-880-1335
Customer Support:866-48-AZBAR, 866-482-9227
Having trouble using this site?
Help us improve
Powered by Legalspan