Complete Catalog OnDemand (Online CLE) CLE Calendar Webcasts CLE2GO Downloadable Publications Self Study Publications HelpLog In | Sign UpPrinter Friendly
Your shopping cart is empty 
E-Chapters from AZ… | Construction Law
search:
advanced
Electronic Document
Electronic Document
Key Issues in Construction Litigation (3/2/12)
Price: $35.00
Document №:SEM910-101
Pages:240
File Size:14 MB
Publish Date:  3/8/2012
Buy Now
Tell a Friend
  Item Description | Authors | Course Materials
Item Description Back to top
 
Key Issues in Construction Litigation
Proving Owner’s Damages; Calculating Pre-Judgment Interest; Plus Other Lessons Learned from the Fairway Builders Decision.
 
Program Chair: Michael J. Holden, Holden Willits PLC
Sponsored by the State Bar of Arizona Construction Law Section
 
This year’s State Bar Construction Law Section All-Day Seminar will analyze the myriad of issues presented in the 1979 Arizona Court of Appeals decision in Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co., Inc.

Fairway Builders is an important case for construction lawyers primarily for its discussion on how to measure the owner’s damages for defective work.

The seminar’s faculty of experienced construction lawyers will use the Fairway Builders decision as the starting point to talk about these and related issues. Because of the wide range of subjects being presented, this seminar should be beneficial for anyone who practices construction law in Arizona.

The specific topics that will be discussed include:

• Cost of repair as the basis for awarding damages
• Dual use of "cost of repair" and "diminution of value" damage measures
• Stigma damages
• Use of statistical extrapolation to prove damages in defect cases
• The effect of "economic waste" on recovering damages
• Recovery and limitation of consequential damages
• Calculating pre-judgment interest
• Is Prompt Pay interest recoverable on mechanics’ lien and bond claims?
• Determining the amounts due on mechanics’ lien claims
• Mechanics’ liens for professional services
• Interpreting ambiguous provisions in contracts

Authors Back to top
David J. Cantelme, Jennings Strouss & Salmon PLC
Melvin Cohen, Mesch, Clark & Rothschild, Tucson
David Damron, Teilborg Sanders & Parks PC, Phoenix
Michael J. Holden, Holden Brodman PLC
Stephen E. Jackson, Warner Angle & Hallam Jackson & Formanek PLC
Jay M. Mann, Mann, Berens & Wisner LLP
Barry A. Willits, Holden Willits PLC, Phoenix
Philip Wooten, DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy PC, Phoenix
Robert O. Dyer, Polsinelli Shugart PC
Jason Ebe, Snell & Wilmer LLP, Phoenix
Richard A. Friedlander, Mariscal Weeks McIntyre & Friedlander PA
Stephen E. Richman, Mariscal Weeks McIntyre & Friedlander PA
John G. Ryan, Ryan Woodrow & Rapp PLC
Sharon B. Shively, Sacks Tierney PA
David C. Tierney, Sacks Tierney PA

Course Materials Back to top

icon_acrobatKey Issues in Construction Litigation (240 Pages, 14 MB)

Users who bought this Electronic Document also bought... Back to top
CLE2GO
Maximizing A Personal Injury or Wrong Death Settlement With Special Needs Planning and Means-Based Public Benefits 
CLE2GO
Commercial Landlord/Tenant Law 
Electronic Document
Trial Practice - CLE by the Sea 2011 
Electronic Document
Litigating the Multi-Party Construction Case (2/06)
Lessons Learned from Pioneering Roofing and Its Progeny
 
CLE2GO
How to Deal with the Ever-Widening World of Domain Names 
Technical Support:877-880-1335
Customer Support:866-48-AZBAR, 866-482-9227
Having trouble using this site?
Help us improve
Powered by Legalspan